Posts Tagged ‘edupunk’

My blog is my PhD

Monday, March 30th, 2009

My Learning

Yesterday marked 3 years of being a blogger. What a wonderful journey it has been!

I may be over exaggerating when saying my blog is my Phd, after all people like Stephen Downes have done this much work and still don’t have one. Furthermore, the focus and intent of my writing has been far from such a standard, and sure to be rejected as a dissertation… BUT…

I know a few people that have a PhD and they have all shared comments like, “I’m never going to school again!”, and “What a painful experience”, and “I’m sooo glad that’s over!”, and even “I’m Done with learning!”

Meanwhile, I’ve never been so excited about learning. and I’m far from done, I’m continuing my journey and 3 years of ‘work’, of reflective learning, has done nothing but broaden my horizons and make me excited about what’s to come.

Personalized Recognition

So for the fun of it, I’ve personalized my journey with a PhB: A Blogtorate of Philosophy.

So what’s this worth? Personally it means the world to me, I wouldn’t trade my blogging/learning experience for any other, but what would this document get me in the ‘real’ world? We are now throwing (very deserving) accolades to DIY / EdupunkLeaders… yet we don’t really ‘credit’ them in a quantifiable way.

Accreditation

So how do we credit all this very real, very meaningful learning? How do we credential-ize the learning that people are sharing online… Things happening outside of classrooms and credits and courses? Who does the next big company want to hire, the Harvard Graduate or one of these ‘candidates’?

What is my blog worth in the world of academia?

Does it really matter that what I’ve done hasn’t been for marks? What’s the big deal if this ‘work’ isn’t counted toward some (archaic) institution?

After all, it has been shared with colleagues around the world;

The last year, since moving to DavidTruss.com

It has been peer reviewed, and quoted, commented on, and even presented… furthermore, it has an extensive bibliography.

Does this count for anything? Should it?

The real value…

This blog has provided me with an opportunity to share my learning, and more than anything else it has challenged me to be accountable in a way that no other professional development ever has. It has reminded me that I love to learn and it is part of a learning process that I truly love. My blog may not get me any more letters after my name but more than anything else, it has set me on a journey I’m going to continue, not for some external reward, but rather for the intrinsic value and for the love of learning.

Appreciation

And now having said all this, I’d like to thank you!

Thanks for being a part of my Personal Learning Network; Thanks for joining me on this journey; And/or thank you for contributing to my learning!

Is the tool an obstacle or an opportunity?

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

[Move your mouse to the right side of the cartoon to see the 3rd cell]

This has been floating around in my head for a while, but Scott McLeod’s ‘Banning Student Computers’ slide and Sonya’s ‘The New Teacher’ inspired me to finally express it visually.
The last time he was in town, Alan November spoke of just how silly it would be to ban pencils like we do cell phones because someone passed a nasty note… It isn’t really about the tools now, is it?

Click the image below to see this full sized on ToonDoo or here for flickr.

Click to see the full size on flickr

Related posts:

Opportunities, Access & Obstacles

ASK [for help] and Ye Shall Receive, SEEK [the right questions] and Ye Shall Find [the right answers].

Digital Teachers

By Design: Please keep the toilet seat in the upright position!

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

[This post is about questioning why we do what we do, so that we can do things in new, better ways. It specifically looks at design, differentiated instruction and assessment.]

I’m going to flush out an idea here and maybe even start a movement! ;-)

If you want to sit on a dry toilet seat, then please make the upright/raised position the default toilet seat position!

By design, toilet seats should be spring loaded to lift slowly after the weight of a seated visitor has been removed.

Many times I’ve heard about Men’s inability to aim for the center of the toilet bowl, but having cleaned Women’s bathrooms in a restaurant before, I must say that we at least have an aiming mechanism! If the seat is not going to be sat on anyway… then why not lift it to make the target bigger? That is a statement equally valuable to Men and Women! By making the raised position the default position, we remove the laziness or poor rearing factors from causing unnecessary seat puddles.

I grew up in a house with three sisters and now live with my wife and two daughters… I’m very well trained to raise the seat, use the toilet and put the seat back down: Operant conditioning at its’ best!

The fact that I’m willing to do it, and the fact that ‘it has always been done that way‘, in no way makes it the best or most effective thing to do.

From the Class of 1957 Southfield High School web site, (linked)

I think that schools are wrought with traditional ways of doing things, not because these are most effective, and not because of smart design, but simply because that’s what was done before.

This year I really want to look at what we do in schools and ask a lot of questions: Why do we do it this way? How can we do it better? What is the purpose of this activity? Does our approach meet our students’ needs? How do we know our students are learning? What results are we expecting to see? Can we get better results by doing this another way? Are all these steps necessary? Why is this approach effective?

It is time for some positive deviance! If you disturb the contents of a toilet, then you know what you will be called, but if you disturb or disrupt an ineffective approach or idea then you have the potential to be a true leader! Here are some ‘positive deviance’ guidelines from Surfing the Edge of Chaos:

1. Design, don’t engineer.
2. Discover, don’t dictate.
3. Decipher, don’t presuppose.

I like this ‘soft’ approach, but I also thing we need to stir the pot (rather than the bowl) a bit. We need teachers that do not go quietly into their classrooms and we need our edupunks to be educational leaders.

- – - – -

Here are three areas that I will be looking at with ‘new eyes’… the eyes of a questioner and a learner looking to do things more meaningfully and effectively.

• Design: Are we teaching this? Why not? When we say, “Do a Powerpoint”, or “Make a video”, are we expecting students to just know how to design these well? Where do students learn these skills? We don’t say “Do an essay”, and expect students to understand how to do this effectively without structural guidance… why is a powerpoint or movie project any different?

• Differentiated Instruction: How are students demonstrating their learning? Can they demonstrate it in different ways? Is this a Powerpoint assignment? Or a movie assignment? Or can a student choose to meet the learning outcomes in a different way? What’s more important, the assignment or the learning? Is the assignment designed with ‘the end in mind’? Does the assignment allow for different students, with different needs, to demonstrate their learning in ways that are meaningful to them?

• Assessment: Are we counting marks or marking what counts? How much does esthetics or design count for? Is this enough, or is it too much? Does the criteria measure the learning outcomes or what’s easy to mark? Does the criteria measure what we told students was important about the assignment? Does the assignment measure what is important about the leaning? Are we adding up the marks or assessing the learning we see demonstrated?

Those are a lot of questions, but I think they are worth asking! We know very well that ‘the right questions’ help our students learn, and so it would follow that the same would apply to our learning.

My challenge now is to figure out when and where it is best to ask these questions.

I’m not going to be leaving my toilet seat in the upright position at home… there is no need to as I find it dry all the time, and I’m the only one that needs it up… but don’t be surprised if you are next after me to use a public washroom and you walk in to find a dry seat waiting for you in the upright position.

By David Truss :: cc BY-NC-SA

Target Practice: Kandinsky meets Warhol in the Bathroom

beg for foregiveness

Saturday, August 16th, 2008

Sometimes it is better to beg for forgiveness
than it is to ask for permission.

We’ve all heard that before, but we can’t all be Gary Stager and do what we want when we want. [Please see the first two comments for some clarification on this statement.] Sometimes we have to be political, sometimes we have to follow protocol, and sometimes we have no choice but to ask for permission. That said there are times when it really is better to just do it… and beg for forgiveness should the need arise.

If you are going to take this approach in your classroom here are two rules and a suggestion.

- – - – -

Rule 1: You are choosing this path because you believe it is best practice.

Rule 2: Your choice of path is safe for students to take.

Suggestion: Share your idea with someone you believe will support you in the interest of the rules above.

- – - – -

Here now is a brief explanation.

Rule 1: If the goal of your actions is to make your job easier, then this is the wrong approach. You need to be doing this for your students. Often we get trapped believing that best practice isn’t easier when actually it can be. For example, we don’t read everything our students write, but we get online and suddenly we think we have to read everything. Create simple, positive rules online and maintain your high expectations… your best practice approach might just make your job easier as an added bonus.

Rule 2: Don’t do something stupid that puts a student in danger or your job on the line. I think this is a self evident rule- the ‘don’t be stupid’ reality check.

Suggestion: Learning conversations and collaboration help put you on the right path. There are other people around you physically or online, who make things happen. Use all the resources available to you and that especially includes people. This can often include asking permission from the right person.

- – - – -

Related:

•Bud the Teacher’s Open Letter to Teachers

•My Learning Conversations presenation at BLC08, my Tribute to teachers, my Edupunk or Educational Leader? post, and my School 2.0 Participants Manifesto.

•Jennifer D. Jones’ Down In Front

Edupunk or Educational Leader?

Thursday, June 19th, 2008

Confession #1: I had planned on calling this post, “Edupunk or edubunk?”

  • bunk: nonsense- a message that seems to convey no meaning
  • That was before reading this simple, but very powerful post by Jen D. Jones. Now I need to change my approach. My main point sits under Confession #3 below.

    - – - – -

    Confession #2: I am not an edupunk… I’ve always been too much of an edunerd to qualify.

    That said, I’ve always sat ‘outside the box’ looking in. I’ve always felt like a square peg in a round hole. I’m an ‘A’ student who went through my first university degree with a ‘C+’ average. I handed almost everything in late (and almost always with no marks off)¹. I ignored criteria and wrote what I wanted. Sometimes this was rewarded, most times it was punished. When I was disinterested in an assignment I walked a fine, and I might add brilliant, line next to what would be considered plagiarism, it was a great strategy that got me through the mundaneness of many useless assignments. I crammed for exams, and I’d stay awake for 3 days (usually after the due date) writing an essay. I’d go into the library and end up half an isle away from the resources I needed, reading something ‘unnecessary’… my pre-FireFox tabbing.

    On my transcript there is a ‘A’ that I got in a course where I didn’t do an assignment worth 25% of my mark (do the math) and there is also a mark of ‘Zero’ for another course. I appealed the ‘Zero’ and then refused to follow the terms of the accepted appeal. I felt the Appeal Board was scolding me with terms I specifically said would make the timeline for completion difficult for me. I punished myself by refusing to meet their requirements on principle… the irony is not lost on me here.

    I spoke up and I spoke out- I never bit my tongue in class. I worked my butt off in a warehouse the summer before university and decided that I was going to get my money’s worth while at school. It always amazed me when I’d ask an obvious question or ask for an explanation because “I’m lost”, and students would thank me after class… “I was so lost too, thanks for asking”… Why didn’t they speak up? What were they afraid of?

    It didn’t matter if I was in a class of 20 or an auditorium of 200, the professor knew my name by the second or third class… sometimes this was to mutual benefit and sometimes purely my own… but I was not intentionally disruptive and I certainly never ‘sucked up’ though I often had to endure the stares of Marshmallows² who thought I was sucking up… I didn’t care.

    My favourite learning experience in school was not from a course. I had a Wednesday night class in the second term of my first year, and after the first class I was invited to join a few people for coffee. (As I tell this I have to chuckle at the fact that I have no recollection of what the Wednesday night course was.) We were a motley crew that spent the next 12 Wednesday nights discussing Religion and the Meaning of Life over a cup of java. Present at these coffee-shop-talks were a third-year student who was Atheist, his second-year devout Catholic girlfriend, a 35 year old ex-Hare Krishna of 14 years who served as their head chef for nine of those years, and then there was me. My values and beliefs were challenged beyond any classroom ever challenged me. We had our own Socrates Cafe where Big Questions were asked and we all took turns trying to answer them.

    As for classes, well I excelled at classes such as the one on Educational Leadership where the The Tao of Leadership was the text, and topics of study included holistic learning. Meanwhile, I floundered in courses like Environmental Geography where I was lectured to from class beginning to bitter end. I have a box somewhere in my garage with some impressive doodles created in that class.

    I remember taking a Philosophy course on Plato in my first year. Whenever I made a point contrary to my professor, or asked him a challenging question, he would respond with, “Well I think Plato would say…”
    So, I was no longer disagreeing with him or questioning his ideas, but rather Plato’s instead! I lost all respect for him after he marked a paper with a comment that went something like this:

    Very well thought out,
    excellent arguments,
    too short! C+

    I knew the word count quota, but felt I’d said all that I needed to³. So I guess that if I had added about 150 more words of fluff, then and only then would I have earned an ‘A’ or at least a ‘B’ on this philosophy paper? To my Plato-Wanna-Be professor I was no Aristotle. By the end of the term he hated me… that was another fine line that I walked!

    My dissent towards criteria was even evident with my Master’s Terminal Paper, (that I finished just two years ago), which is now used as my advisor’s example of what not to do (…of going too far, and being too long). At one point she asked me to shorten my paper so I edited one paragraph by about two sentences and then widened my margins.

    So, am I an edupunk? To me, the answer is still ‘No’. I’m not a rebel, I didn’t buck the system. I was just a stubborn learner who let my surrounding environment determine when and if I chose to learn… not a lone wolf as much as a disgruntled sheep. The truth hurts, but I’m a big boy now and I can take it.

    - – - – -

    Confession #3: I don’t like the term Edupunk

    Stephen Downes loves the term. Alec finds Meaning and Identity:

    …I am going to take Jen’s advice seriously when she says about edupunk “Don’t dissect the metaphor“. Edupunk, if nothing more, has got many people talking, exploring their beliefs around education, and in some cases, reminiscing of day’s long past. The educational community is much too diverse, as it should be, for anyone to cling on to one single metaphor for meaning.

    Well, it certainly got me reminiscing, so what’s wrong with the term?

    These are not Edupunks, they are Educational Leaders! The reality is that anti-establishment, Do-It-Yourself, transformative, collaborative, networked teachers doing new things, in new ways, in new wall-less, time-zone-less, textbook-less, standardized-test-less classrooms are paving the way for a new kind of schooling. I’ll say this again in a different way:

    These are not Edupunks, they are Educational Leaders! They are our role models paving a new path to a more meaningful educational experience in our schools. They may be on the fringe, but they are also at the forefront. They are leading the way.

    When I went to ContinUO we read Surfing the Edge of Chaos. Here we can find the appeal of Edupunks, but we can see that in reality we are speaking of our new Leaders.

    “The fringes are the source of most truly innovative ideas in cultures, economies and organizations.”

    But a problem arises in,

    “…recognizing when the fringe has created something so important that it no longer deserves to be fringe.” (Alex Trisoglio, pg.31)

    Our so-called Edupunks are figuring out a new path as they go… this isn’t about rogues, it is about adult learners who are trailblazing without a map.

    “As a general rule, adults are much more likely to act their way into a new way of thinking than to think their way into a new way of acting.” (pg. 14)

    Also in the book, Monsanto’s CEO Robert Shapiro speaks of Foresight (seeing ahead), Insight (seeing deeply), Speed, and Courage (pgs. 82-85). These are all things that I see in the educators being called Edupunks.

    Let’s not put our leaders into fringe categories. Let’s recognize them as the trailblazers they are. They are Surfing the Edge of Chaos (or should I say educhaos)… and what they really deserve is our appreciation, thanks, and respect.

    - – - – -

    Footnotes: As a teacher…

    I guess you could say that at times I too have ‘acted my way into a new way of thinking’. My actions as a learner influenced my actions as a teacher, as these footnotes suggest.

    ¹ As a teacher, I don’t take any marks off for something coming in late. It is my job to make sure that students demonstrate their learning and meet the learning outcomes during the year. All time lines within the year are arbitrary (and usually teacher determined) and not a requirement worthy of penalty. Exceptions may be made where either Personal Planning or Goal Setting are part of the outcomes.

    ² As a teacher, I am very vocal about students needing to speak up and ask questions. “Don’t be a Marshmallow!” was a saying that I took from my Grade 10 English teacher Mr. La Point who used it to symbolize placid students sitting in his class and choosing not to speak up. At first being called Marshmallows in my class was funny, but soon students would catch on that they were not meeting expectations when they were being Marshmallows!

    ³ As a teacher my response to ‘how long does this assignment need to be?’ has always been, “It needs to be as long as it needs to be.” Students hate this answer, but after a while they get it. In a nutshell: I’ve read three brilliant sentences that have said more than three long-winded paragraphs.

    Subscribe Here!
    Pair-of-Dimes-RSS-Animated

    Or have posts
    delivered to you...
    Enter your email address:


    Pairadimes Odiogo Listen Button

    Also connect here:

    Twitter Button LinkedIn Button

    Click to Translate
    Explore…
    Subscribe Now!
    Pair-of-Dimes-RSS

    Or have posts
    delivered to you...
    Enter your email address:


    Pairadimes Odiogo Listen Button

    Also connect here:

    Twitter Button LinkedIn Button

    Delicious Button YouTube Button

    Flickr Button FaceBook button

    David Truss
    David Truss Background
    DavidTruss.com
    My 'About' Page
    Resource On
    Student Leadership
    Newsletter ('08)
    Digital Magic
    Follow me:
    Follow me!
    Around the Web:

    Search Pairadimes
    My picks
    Two Wolves Which wolf will you feed? A Remembrance Day Post
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Warning! We filter websites at school.
    Filters filter learning!
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    My blog is my PhD I have given myself a Blogtorate of Philosophy.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Bubble Wrap What we are doing is creating a facade of security, nothing more than an illusion of bubble wrap.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Who are the People in Your Neighbourhood? My (digital) neighbourhood spans the globe.