A few weeks back I was in a Grade 9 class that was working on Lit Circles. The conversation progressed to the teacher asking, “So why do we do lit circles?”

The first student to answer said, “To get an ‘A’.”

I know the student well enough that I was able to interject and say, “That’s a horrible answer!”

Some teachers like to say that, “All answers are good answers,” and in a way this was a good answer in that it brought up a really good discussion. However, I believe that when a student gives a really weak or ‘easy’ answer to a big question, there’s nothing wrong with calling them on it and telling them, ‘that’s a really bad answer’!

To explain my response, I asked a few questions:

“You have all learned about photosynthesis in Science, right?”

“What is the purpose of photosynthesis?”

A few answers later we got consensus that it was to create sugars, or ‘food’ for the plant. Then I asked, “What is a byproduct of photosynthesis?” To which the first response was ‘Oxygen’, a very useful byproduct of this process.

I then explained that like photosynthesis, “Getting an ‘A’,” is the byproduct, not the purpose of learning. An ‘A’ is a positive byproduct that can come from hard work, understanding, and a passion for what you are doing, (and hopefully a mixture of all three of these things!) “So what is the purpose of a lit circle?”

The following conversation was pretty rich. My Grade 9 teacher, only in his second year, is very skillful in using “Talk to your neighbour, then talk to me” as a strategy. He has built high expectations that when he says that, students are expected to take the ideas being discussed and meaningfully share them in pairs or table groups. He maximizes the depth of conversation using this strategy to help students develop their ideas before sharing them with the class. He broke down the conversation to “What are the qualities of a good lit circle?” on route to answering the bigger question of ‘purpose’.

On my way out the door a student asked me, “So what do you think is the purpose of a lit circle?”

I shared a story about one of my favourite books, The Alchemist. I bought and read this book, and did something I don’t usually do, but that a friend of mine often does when he reads books. I wrote page numbers and references down on a blank page at the back of the book, I took small notes on interesting things. After reading it I lent it to a friend and I requested that he do the same thing. Then I lent it to another friend and asked her to repeat the process.

When I got the book back I read their notes and something really neat happened. A few of their notes reminded me of things I read and passed up taking notes on. Today, years later, one of my favourite parts of the book is something that one of my friends ‘reminded’ me of in the back-of-the-book notes… not something I had originally noted to remember.

This wasn’t a lit circle in the same sense that was happening in the class, but it shared the same purpose: a greater understanding and appreciation for the book (and for reading).

__________

Related post: Chasing the ‘A’

Excerpt:

Marks seem to take our attention away from what matters. I find it funny that we can assess young kids without grades and then around Grade 3 we suddenly start indoctrinating students into the paradigm of good marks = success…. and the really important things we learn in Kindergarten about sharing, respecting and loving one another, as well as communicating how we feel and getting along with each other, suddenly takes a back seat to achieving some sort of success beyond these things that really matter.

_____

Also see George Couros’: What Makes a Master Teacher

Excerpt:

6. Focuses on learning goals as opposed to performance goals – Reading “Drive” by Dan Pink, he talks about the difference between performance and learning goals.  A performance goal would be similar to having students wanting to receive an “A” in french where a learning goal would be a student wanting to become fluent in the language.  Many students are smart enough that they know how to meet the objectives of a rubric and still not grow much in their learning.  A master teacher sets the goals based on learning not on receiving a grade.  This type of assessment is not about understanding what a students knows and reporting on it, but it is a tool used for learning.

I started this post sitting in a waiting room at the auto shop waiting for my car: No WiFi, pay-for coffee and snacks available. It had an outlet if my laptop battery didn’t hold out, comfortable seats and, if I was interested, a tv to make the experience a little more comfortable. But I knew exactly what I wanted to do. I am a fan of Alan November and I just downloaded, to my iTunes, his November Learning Podcast Series. With ear plugs in and a word doc open, (I would have preferred Google docs), I began listening to Alan November interview Dan Pink.

A little history here…
My first classroom blogging experience was inspired by an Alan November webcast that launched me into my web2.0 experiences… (My teaching2.0? What do you call this transformation?
…And a question on the side…
What do you call a digital ‘immigrant’ that is fully immersed in a digital world? I am an immigrant to Canada, but truly consider myself a Canadian, though I will never be a ‘native’. Perhaps I am a Digital Citizen, or more aptly a Digital Denizen!

den•i•zen noun formal or humorous an inhabitant or occupant of a particular place : denizens of field and forest. • Brit., historical a foreigner allowed certain rights in the adopted country.

---

Here are the highlights of the interviews with my two-dimes worth added in!

Interview 1: With Dan Pink

Pink Re: Standardized Testing as a measure of a school. “What ultimately I care about is the individual kids, that’s what parents care about and obviously that what the kids themselves care about… if I had a magic wand I would do a very serious, very radical overhaul of the entire education system”.

We have to be willing to measure these: (From Wikipedia on Dan Pink’s A Whole New Mind )

1. Design – Moving beyond function to engage the sense.
2. Story – Narrative added to products and services – not just argument.
3. Symphony – Adding invention and big picture thinking (not just detail focus).
4. Empathy – Going beyond logic and engaging emotion and intuition.
5. Play – Bringing humor and light-heartedness to business and products.
6. Meaning – Immaterial feelings and values of products.

As long as we measure schools and measure students with tests that do not appreciate and include measuring a student’s ability to express these senses, we are measuring the wrong things.

I have an idea: First we will measure a poem with a word count… Then we will measure compassion with a ruler… And finally we will measure the making of a work of art with a stop watch. Then we will add the numbers together and tell you how well your child is doing in school.

From a previous post , “there is a dichotomy here: Our ‘educational language’ around standardization and accountability juxtaposed with differentiation and flexibility… we seem to have two mutually exclusive camps, yet there seems to be a move to embrace both. To embrace both is to accomplish neither.”

---

Interview 2: Dan Pink

School architects use a 35-year-old formula, with teachers left out of the conversation… “Appalling that a Starbucks is a more appealing place to be than a classroom.

It doesn’t have to be more expensive, just smarter. If you built cabinets and shelving units for picture-tube tv’s or carrying cases for Sony Walkman’s and you didn’t adapt your designs, where would you be now?

Pink: People are opting out of the public/formal education system… “Our education establishment, which we pay lip service to as the most important element of our society, are probably the most out of sync with the realities of 21 century life than any other institution in American society.

‘This is important! We need to change… pass the chalk’.

November: Emerging models – Schools… “should be much more embedded in the community, where kids are adding value and making a difference, much more action based.”

---

Interview 3: Dan Pink
(The last podcast (#2) ended a discussion about Design: Creating things in context, ideally cross-curricular. This theme continued here.)

Pink: The two most important things in professional success & personal fulfillment are “intrinsic motivation & persistence.”

I wonder how much schools pay attention to these two things? Even when we praise, we don’t inspire intrinsic motivation, and although in some ways we promote persistence, we also give students a grade of ‘C’ and move on.

---

Interview: Dr. Mitchel Resnick (MIT)
Topics: Creativity and Innovation to the Digital Divide
Research group name: Lifelong Kindergarten Group (kindergarten-like exploration and play)

Many of the best learning opportunities come when people are engaged in creating and designing things.

Check out http://scratch.mit.edu/ (I’ve been here a few times, but need to explore the possibilities)

Sharing… building on other’s ideas… ‘borrowing’ not copying. Give proper credit and acknowledgement and then adapt and go further, and then putting your ideas out there for others to add to.

This reminds me of the Larry Lessig’s TED Video I recently watched on ‘(Re)-creativity’.

If you give credit, it isn’t ‘appropriates’ but rather ‘appropriate’!

---

Reinforcing the thoughts of Resnick I recently found this post on the blog of none other than Dan Pink:

Re: a pop artists exhibit , “The show celebrates the fizzy remixing typical of Pop Art and is replete with “cut up magazines, copied comic books, . . trademarked cartoon characters like Minnie Mouse… But in a bizarre move, the curators have banned photographs — not to protect the physical integrity of the works, but to avoid infringing on the copyright of the creators.”

The irony is not lost on me.

Originally posted: November 20th, 2007 Reflection upon re-reading and re-posting: My italicized comments in this post are seeping with sarcasm… which I note and reflect on in my next post. In truth, I’m not a huge fan of podcasts, primarily because I am a very visual learner and also because I have not had a commute longer than 3.5km in the last 9 years. I’m either in the car with others or I’m in the car for 5-7 minutes. So, usually when I’m trying to listen to a podcast is when I have my computer in front of me, (in which case I tend to start reading something else and the podcast becomes background noise). Listening to these podcasts with a word document open for note-taking made them worthwhile to listen to since I could ‘see’ what I was learning from listening.

Kelly Christopherson has put out an invitation to join a book club. For those of you who have not visited Kelly yet, his blog Educational Discourse is a blog from the trenches. He is a Principal who also teaches and coaches. Kelly’s blog posts are not only thoughtful and insightful, they are written with a personal touch… they have heart.

Kelly has suggested a wiki or a forum, or skype as examples of places we can meet and ‘chat’… who knows we could even meet in Second Life. These are only suggestions, we invite other ideas. The simple goal of this Book Club is to create a space where participants can get together and have a meaningful, enjoyable learning conversation.

As an example of how a Book Club can enrich the reading experience, A Whole New Mind introduces Six Senses, each with a working Portfolio. These portfolios all have website links to follow… wouldn’t it be great if 6 (or more) people each collected the links from just one chapter, explored them, and provided them on a wiki with comments as to what they thought about the sites they visited? I’d be far more likely to interact with others contributing this way, than to go to all these links on my own.

Let one of us know if you are interested.

Originally posted: February 19th, 2007 Reflection upon re-reading and re-posting: We decided on a wiki, Kelly got it set up and I played with setting up the chapters for discussion. A few things happened, or rather didn’t happen, to make this far less successful that it could have been. I think the biggest flaw was that we never set any specific deadlines. Specifically we didn’t plan a live (online) discussion, or even an ‘end’ date to have things completed by. Essentially we didn’t build in the scaffolding and expectations that, as teachers, we all know is necessary to get a good project from students. Yes we are all adults, but we all have busy lives and I know that my commitment to the ‘project’ would have been far greater if I had specific deadlines to meet. The more time I spend with web2.0 tools, and the more mainstream they become, it becomes blatantly obvious that good pedagogy and the creation of meaningful assignments that build on caring relationships is what really matters. The tool doesn’t matter… using it well does!