blogging, connecting online, education, Learning Conversations, pairadimes, reflection

Reflections: Visit Counts, Technorati, Comments and Ego: A Good, Bad, and (almost) Indifferent Post

An honest look at my blog.

Foster City Reflections

The Good: • This site, elgg.net, is not going to be called EduFilter (seems my e-mail wasn’t the only complaint). Elgg is now EduSpaces, a name a number of us recommended – though I bear no claim to my voice being listened to since I also offered a dozen other alternatives.

The Bad: • All my links to the site need changing, this isn’t necessary since elgg rather than eduspaces in the address still works, but I would rather that my Flickr, Curriki, LinkedIn, & other blogs etc. all had my updated links.

The (I wish I was) Indifferent: • My Technorati URL needs to change. THE BIG QUESTION: Why did this bother me?

There are two reasons that I can think of: TIMING and EGO.

Timing:
My blog is getting more attention than it ever has. Some noted bloggers: Stephen Downes, Scott McLeod, Wesley Freyer, Miguel Guhlin, and Vicki Davis (on EdTech Talk ) have all given my Web2.0 Prophecy: an Adventure a plug and linked to it with my old elgg address. This attention has doubled traffic to my site and I thank them for this! Yet I sit here pretending it didn’t bother me that they are linked to my old Technorati address rather than the new one. This leads to the main reason the URL change bothered me…

Ego:
I while back I e-mailed Scott McLeod in response to his top edublogs? post and wrote this:

“As I said in my comment, thank you for doing this and being honest about your interest in your ranking.
I think a significant number people care and don’t admit it, and I admire someone who openly admits it. I haven’t really paid attention to my rank- being new myself- I have had my blog for almost a year, but would consider myself a ‘blogger’ a la Will Richardson for only a few months now. However I have been watching my number of visits and my clustrmap religiously… not the ranking itself, but it shows my concern in the same vain.” [Link (above) added for this post.]

Here comes the honest part: I like to go to my sitemeter and see where people visit me from. I like seeing the dots grow, in number and in size, on my clustrmap… and I like when I see new links in Technorati. Why?

The fact is, that I want to be well read, and I want my blog to be recognized. Scott McLeod says it best at the end of his ‘top edublogs?’ post:

“P.S. I unapologetically admit that I care about my Technorati ranking. Why? Because I’m trying to make change. The bigger audience I have, the more readers I reach directly and the more people I can influence indirectly through those readers. I’m on a mission. Aren’t you?”

So, not only have I mulled over the change in URL, I have also reflected on this blog quite a bit.
After having this blog for almost a year, this is what I know…
Besides my Web2.0 Prophecy post, the posts that get attention are:

1. Square Peg, Round Hole – a collection of other people’s ideas around schools not fitting kids that I have been adding to until recently, now a second post is in the works.

2. Portal Needed to Connect Classrooms to the World: Global Citizens can Share Talents and Skills with Students and the accompanying wiki fieldfindr, (yesterday fieldfindr had more hits than my blog… almost a month after I created it as a mock-up to go along with the post). When will someone make this a reality?

3. The digital native, the digital naive, and the digital divide – among other things, the idea that maybe students of this generation aren’t fully at the digital native stage… yet.

4. Leadership Lesson Plans – found in my files rather than my blog. Thanks mostly to Curriki, these get visited and downloaded a number of times daily. I am glad I can offer these resourses that I have found useful in teaching Leadership.

And in my opinion, the most under-rated post: School 2.0 Participant’s Manifesto – Manifesto’s are big in education and schools2.0 but they mostly focus on the changes needed to the system. Here, I look at the responsibilities of the learner– remember them?… the people we are ‘doing this stuff to‘. (ok, that was a bit cheeky!)

To anyone reading my blog for the first time, Learning Conversations is a post that quotes a lot of my other posts and gives a sense for what this blog is about, and what it means to me.


And now, in case this post hasn’t been self-indulgent enough,
I will reflect a little more on this blog.

The Good:
•Quality. I take pride in my posts and although I still do them primarily for myself, I am keenly aware that I have an audience. This has made me a much better writer… (and it can do the same for students!)
•Recognition. My site is slowly growing in readership. Fear not ‘A list’ bloggers your position is safe, I’m not tilting the blogosphere on its’ head here, but I do consider myself an agent of change, and I will make my world a better place!
•Meaningful dialogue. I have enjoyed the learning conversations that I have had online. I have not been this excited about learning- ever! Was it like this in school for anyone? Not me.

The Bad:
•In-click/Out-click. I am amazed at how ridiculous some of the Google Searches are that lead to my site. For example I have the phrase ‘Webkinz-dot-com’ in a post that happens to touch an image of a (totally unrelated) bridge. 2-5 times a week I get hits from Webkinz (stuffed animal) image searches – Hardly what I would call a meaningful hit.
•Time. I spend too much time on the computer. I can’t keep up with my feedreader. Both reading and writing are slow processes for me. I started highlighting ‘New Voices’ but have stopped recently because I haven’t read any recently. I resolve this by sleeping less, but I can’t keep this up much longer. Who is doing all this well? And what is your secret???
•Comments. I spend a bit of time each week commenting on blogs… continuing the conversation. But I seem to generate very few commenters on my blog. This might be a result of my next point.
•Post length. I am long-winded. Most of my posts are lengthy. Are readers even getting to the end of them? I think it was Vicki Davis who wrote ‘write it, then cut it in half.’ I have to learn to do this… it won’t be easy for me. Even this post is probably too long!
The Indifferent:
•Technorati. It took a few days but I’m over it. I really don’t mind that I am starting over. I will enjoy watching the links grow again. I have never gone to Technorati to see someone else’s ranking and judged their site as a result. In fact, in a comment on Christian Long’s post Stop Blogging Because You’re An Educator I state: “…Warlick and Richardson seem to be more about post-cards than edu-posts.” I’ve noticed that many of the really meaningful posts that I have read recently have not come from the ‘big boys’ but rather the boys and girls- like me – that are in the trenches, trying to make sense of where schools are now, and where they need to be.


Speaking of the trenches, here is a new voice for you (#5 of 7): Read Claudia Ceraso’s The Price of Evolution in your Teaching Practice.

– – – – –

Images: Foster City Reflections and Under The Bridge 2 are both by Peter Kaminski on Flickr.

– – – – –

Originally posted: March 20th, 2007

Reflection upon re-reading and re-posting:

Changes:

So here I am on my 3rd URL, once again messing up my links/Technorati following – I hope this is the last move!

When elgg links no longer worked for eduspaces, (a change I was not expecting), my blog stats took a real blow. I had no way of informing rss readers of the address change. When eduspaces was threatening to close down, that’s when I ventured into the world of self-hosting.

Apology:

In this post I was unfair to David Warlick and Will Richardson. They do so much for edubloggers and also for education, and yet I made some condescending remarks towards them. They may not be ‘in the trenches’ the way teachers are… but they are leaders that are fighting the same war. David & Will, I am sorry for being overly critical and unappreciative of what you have done to lead us.

Comments:

These are the comments on the original post.

– – – – –

  1. Dave,
    I see you’ve been writing up a storm! I know what you mean about the vainness and ego that we seem to grow as we begin writing. I can empathize with the lack of sleep but mine isn’t from the rss or the writing these days! I know how you feel about trying to be read and wondering what is going on. I think, and this is a fairly thin theory, that there are many, many blurkers who read and don’t comment. For both you and I, we have passed that stage and we want to bring about change because we see the great benefit that it will bring. I, too, really liked the Web2.0:An adventure. I just haven’t had time to give you any feedback!! Take care. We’ll have to “link” up one of these days. Take care. Keep writing. And don’t worry about the size of your posts. I’ve gotten past that. If it is worthy, people will read. Your’s are worthy Dave!

    Kelly Christopherson on Friday, 23 March 2007, 00:46 CE

  2. Thanks Kelly,
    I have the same sentiments about your posts. In fact, if you go to the last link in the post above- leading to a Christian Long post, you will find this in my comment, “I got here after reading a post by Kelly (see his comment above). I enjoy reading his posts, but some of them can take 20+ min. to read when I am in the mood to follow the links, and Kelly is very good at making the links meaningfully relevant.” That is why I am having so many issues with my reading. I love hyperlinking to follow certain thoughts and ideas, but it can take so long… this cartoon sums it up:

    cartoon from www.weblogcartoons.com

    Cartoon by Dave Walker.  Find more cartoons you can freely re-use on your blog at We Blog Cartoons.

    **

    Thanks again for your comment!

    Dave.

    David Truss on Friday, 23 March 2007, 03:00 CET

  3. David,
    After our “chat” at Explode I added you to my RSS and looked forward to having time to come back. Here I am. Glad this post is a kind of guide to your blog highlights.

    I agree with you. Your post is long. If I could edit it, I would cut off this bit:

    “Are readers even getting to the end of them? I think it was Vicki Davis who wrote ‘write it, then cut it in half.’ I have to learn to do this… it won’t be easy for me. Even this post is probably too long!”

    Just that. Because those lines are somebody else’s idea in an altogether different blog. They can shine in the original blog. They are not words consistent with the “voice from the trenches” spirit you have built up here, which is precisely what keeps you reading.

    Please do not write in your own blog according to rules you were not consulted to shape up.

    For your stats, I read your post twice (I tell you this because I’m sure Technorati won’t). I like the way you use lines to subdivide your post. They prepared my mind for a new turn in your thoughts.

    Yet, I admit I was totally unprepared to find a link to my blog at the end!

    Claudia Ceraso on Friday, 23 March 2007, 03:09 CET

  4. As a newbie blogger, I share many of the sentiments you express, Dave. However, my main reason for blogging is to express and share my ideas and thoughts, engage others in discussion, and hopefully make change, in my own teaching or in the teaching and leadership of another person.
    However, there is a rock-star sort of film which covers edublogs, and I wish that weren’t the case.

    Miss Profe on Friday, 23 March 2007, 14:53 CET

  5. Thank you Claudia and Miss Profe,Claudia, excellent point. As mentioned above, I will gladly read Kelly’s longer posts or for that matter any long posts when I find one that is worth reading… and often we get pleasantly surprised towards the end of a post. Wink -Also, thanks for the feedback on the breaks/line dividers, I find them useful in shifting my thoughts and it is nice to know that is being passed on the to the reader.Miss Profe, I am not sure if it is possible to blog, as we both do, and not have it change us in a meaningful way… and I’m sure the changes have a positive ripple outward to those we have influence on. Thanks for your comment!

    David Truss on Tuesday, 27 March 2007, 09:46 CEST